New Zealand vs Rwanda: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- New Zealand
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 97.01 % against 95.82 % in New Zealand, a difference of 1.19 %.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 71st and Rwanda ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 37.85 % | 601.41 % | 563.56 % | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 44.16 % | 588.94 % | 544.78 % | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 69.4 % | 529.6 % | 460.2 % | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 60.87 % | 372.86 % | 311.99 % | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 55.78 % | 293.78 % | 238 % | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 73.93 % | 143.2 % | 69.27 % | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 79.68 % | 83.51 % | 3.83 % | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, New Zealand or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 97.01 % against 95.82 % in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 1.19 %, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Rwanda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- New Zealand ranks 71st and Rwanda ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).