Nicaragua vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Nicaragua
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 54.45 % against 54.13 % in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.32 %.
The two have swapped places 24 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 130th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 82.44 % | 59.75 % | 22.7 % | Nicaragua |
| 1970s | 70.85 % | 53.38 % | 17.47 % | Nicaragua |
| 1980s | 59.1 % | 61.76 % | 2.66 % | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 62.38 % | 55.75 % | 6.63 % | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 51.42 % | 85.62 % | 34.2 % | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 51.08 % | 55.77 % | 4.69 % | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 51.68 % | 51.75 % | 0.0678 % | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Nicaragua or Zimbabwe?
- Nicaragua, at 54.45 % against 54.13 % in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?
- 0.32 %, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Nicaragua ranks 130th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).