Northern Europe vs Ukraine: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Northern Europe
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 219.83 % against 80.94 % in Northern Europe, a difference of 138.89 %.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 2.7 times Northern Europe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Northern Europe ahead.
Northern Europe ranks 7th and Ukraine ranks 14th of 10 groups.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Europe | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.11 % | 61.38 % | 13.27 % | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 62.24 % | 121.31 % | 59.07 % | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 73.4 % | 147.52 % | 74.13 % | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 79.54 % | 174.08 % | 94.54 % | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Northern Europe or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 219.83 % against 80.94 % in Northern Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Northern Europe and Ukraine?
- 138.89 %, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Europe and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Northern Europe and Ukraine rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Northern Europe ranks 7th and Ukraine ranks 14th of 10 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).