Panama vs Spain: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Panama
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 39.13 % against 36.94 % in Panama, a difference of 2.19 %.
That makes Spain's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 160th and Spain ranks 158th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 5 and Spain in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 62.02 % | 33.53 % | 28.49 % | Panama |
| 1970s | 48.67 % | 31.35 % | 17.32 % | Panama |
| 1980s | 49.61 % | 37 % | 12.61 % | Panama |
| 1990s | 41.01 % | 33.61 % | 7.4 % | Panama |
| 2000s | 54.48 % | 41.75 % | 12.73 % | Panama |
| 2010s | 33.66 % | 47.53 % | 13.87 % | Spain |
| 2020s | 41.59 % | 49.25 % | 7.66 % | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Panama or Spain?
- Spain, at 39.13 % against 36.94 % in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Panama and Spain?
- 2.19 %, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Spain?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Spain rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Panama ranks 160th and Spain ranks 158th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).