Panama vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Panama
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Panama currently reports 36.94 % against 35.81 % in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 1.13 %.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 160th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 62.02 % | 22.71 % | 39.31 % | Panama |
| 1970s | 48.67 % | 21.61 % | 27.06 % | Panama |
| 1980s | 49.61 % | 19.73 % | 29.87 % | Panama |
| 1990s | 51.06 % | 28.91 % | 22.15 % | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Panama or Yugoslav SFR?
- Panama, at 36.94 % against 35.81 % in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Panama and Yugoslav SFR?
- 1.13 %, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Panama and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Panama ranks 160th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).