Romania vs Sweden: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- Romania
- Sweden
How they compare
Romania currently reports 75.67 % against 73.39 % in Sweden, a difference of 2.28 %.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 98th and Sweden ranks 101st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 43.54 % | 22.72 % | 20.82 % | Romania |
| 1970s | 28.09 % | 27.15 % | 0.9364 % | Romania |
| 1980s | 25.07 % | 39.41 % | 14.34 % | Sweden |
| 1990s | 53.35 % | 52.94 % | 0.4154 % | Romania |
| 2000s | 70.61 % | 67.48 % | 3.13 % | Romania |
| 2010s | 77.76 % | 75.66 % | 2.11 % | Romania |
| 2020s | 67.91 % | 79.24 % | 11.33 % | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Romania or Sweden?
- Romania, at 75.67 % against 73.39 % in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Romania and Sweden?
- 2.28 %, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Romania and Sweden rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- Romania ranks 98th and Sweden ranks 101st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).