South Sudan vs Tajikistan, Republic of: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time
- South Sudan
- Tajikistan, Republic of
How they compare
Tajikistan, Republic of currently reports 76.79 % against 76 % in South Sudan, a difference of 0.79 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tajikistan, Republic of ahead.
South Sudan ranks 86th and Tajikistan, Republic of ranks 84th of 185 countries.
Tajikistan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Tajikistan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 72.07 % | 80.75 % | 8.69 % | Tajikistan, Republic of |
| 2020s | 72 % | 75.54 % | 3.54 % | Tajikistan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, South Sudan or Tajikistan, Republic of?
- Tajikistan, Republic of, at 76.79 % against 76 % in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between South Sudan and Tajikistan, Republic of?
- 0.79 %, with Tajikistan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tajikistan, Republic of?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Tajikistan, Republic of rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
- South Sudan ranks 86th and Tajikistan, Republic of ranks 84th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).