Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency

Syrian Arab Republic
227.42 %
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
140.83 %
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic rank
2nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency over time

  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 227.42 % against 140.83 % in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 86.59 %.

That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Syrian Arab Republic ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 18 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Syrian Arab Republic averaged higher in 3 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 252.1 % 230.26 % 21.84 % Syrian Arab Republic
1970s 134.49 % 187.99 % 53.5 % United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 63.19 % 207.75 % 144.55 % United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 61.4 % 228.17 % 166.77 % United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 83.67 % 278.24 % 194.57 % United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 343.97 % 228.6 % 115.37 % Syrian Arab Republic
2020s 240.81 % 182.07 % 58.74 % Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency, Syrian Arab Republic or United Republic of Tanzania?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 227.42 % against 140.83 % in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency between Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
86.59 %, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus use efficiency?
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-phosphorus-use-efficiency/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-phosphorus-use-efficiency/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).