Armenia vs Comoros: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus

Armenia
-622.6 t
in 2023
Comoros
-392.24 t
in 2023
Armenia rank
148th
Comoros rank
145th

Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Armenia
  • Comoros
-2.0k-1.0k01.0k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Comoros currently reports -392.24 t against -622.6 t in Armenia, a difference of 230.36 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 148th and Comoros ranks 145th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Comoros in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Comoros Difference Ahead
1990s 658.54 t -214.66 t 873.2 t Armenia
2000s -1,134 t -252.47 t 881.69 t Comoros
2010s -1,460 t -398.59 t 1,062 t Comoros
2020s -252.75 t -398.91 t 146.16 t Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Armenia or Comoros?
Comoros, at -392.24 t against -622.6 t in Armenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Armenia and Comoros?
230.36 t, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Comoros?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Comoros rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
Armenia ranks 148th and Comoros ranks 145th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).