Australia vs Nigeria: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Australia
- Nigeria
How they compare
Australia currently reports -54,454 t against -195,882 t in Nigeria, a difference of 141,428 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 198th and Nigeria ranks 201st of 201 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 213,730 t | -41,093 t | 254,823 t | Australia |
| 1970s | 208,586 t | -33,476 t | 242,062 t | Australia |
| 1980s | 164,840 t | -13,415 t | 178,256 t | Australia |
| 1990s | 164,805 t | -85,459 t | 250,263 t | Australia |
| 2000s | 170,285 t | -141,343 t | 311,628 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 94,984 t | -150,114 t | 245,098 t | Australia |
| 2020s | 68,172 t | -183,487 t | 251,659 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Australia or Nigeria?
- Australia, at -54,454 t against -195,882 t in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Australia and Nigeria?
- 141,428 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Nigeria?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Nigeria rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Australia ranks 198th and Nigeria ranks 201st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).