Austria vs Costa Rica: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Austria
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 8,476 t against 7,088 t in Austria, a difference of 1,388 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 60th and Costa Rica ranks 57th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 6 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 64,540 t | 2,774 t | 61,766 t | Austria |
| 1970s | 55,082 t | 5,151 t | 49,931 t | Austria |
| 1980s | 43,672 t | 5,577 t | 38,095 t | Austria |
| 1990s | 30,961 t | 10,137 t | 20,824 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 18,247 t | 10,564 t | 7,683 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 13,479 t | 9,795 t | 3,685 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 7,927 t | 8,020 t | 93.06 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Austria or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 8,476 t against 7,088 t in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Austria and Costa Rica?
- 1,388 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Costa Rica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Costa Rica rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Austria ranks 60th and Costa Rica ranks 57th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).