Azerbaijan vs Melanesia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Azerbaijan
- Melanesia
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports -2,819 t against -3,439 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 620 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 160th and Melanesia ranks 158th of 201 countries.
Melanesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1,080 t | -58.81 t | 1,021 t | Melanesia |
| 2000s | -6,883 t | -942.01 t | 5,941 t | Melanesia |
| 2010s | -4,027 t | -2,520 t | 1,507 t | Melanesia |
| 2020s | -2,489 t | -1,683 t | 806.69 t | Melanesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Azerbaijan or Melanesia?
- Melanesia, at -2,819 t against -3,439 t in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Azerbaijan and Melanesia?
- 620 t, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Melanesia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Melanesia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Azerbaijan ranks 160th and Melanesia ranks 158th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).