Barbados vs Jordan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Barbados
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 556.52 t against 369.57 t in Barbados, a difference of 186.95 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.5 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 103rd and Jordan ranks 100th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -260.34 t | -1,079 t | 818.51 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 158.24 t | 681.36 t | 523.12 t | Jordan |
| 1980s | 409.1 t | 1,694 t | 1,285 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 208.19 t | 2,287 t | 2,079 t | Jordan |
| 2000s | 264.46 t | 1,230 t | 965.22 t | Jordan |
| 2010s | 401.01 t | 216.72 t | 184.29 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 384.02 t | 114.06 t | 269.96 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Barbados or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 556.52 t against 369.57 t in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Barbados and Jordan?
- 186.95 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Jordan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Jordan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Barbados ranks 103rd and Jordan ranks 100th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).