Belarus vs Sudan (former): Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belarus
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 53,932 t against 52,516 t in Belarus, a difference of 1,416 t.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 23rd and Sudan (former) ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72,289 t | -1,137 t | 73,426 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 60,817 t | -524.17 t | 61,341 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 111,722 t | 59,612 t | 52,110 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Belarus or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 53,932 t against 52,516 t in Belarus as of 2011.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Belarus and Sudan (former)?
- 1,416 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sudan (former)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Belarus and Sudan (former) rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Belarus ranks 23rd and Sudan (former) ranks 21st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).