Belgium vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belgium
- Serbia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 17,058 t against 16,935 t in Serbia, a difference of 123 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 44th of 201 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26,094 t | 12,680 t | 13,414 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 21,335 t | 11,348 t | 9,988 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 19,836 t | 14,085 t | 5,751 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Belgium or Serbia?
- Belgium, at 17,058 t against 16,935 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Belgium and Serbia?
- 123 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Belgium ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 44th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).