Belgium vs Tunisia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus

Belgium
17,058 t
in 2023
Tunisia
15,892 t
in 2023
Belgium rank
43rd
Tunisia rank
46th

Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Belgium
  • Tunisia
-10.0k010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 17,058 t against 15,892 t in Tunisia, a difference of 1,166 t.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 46th of 201 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 30,306 t 6,399 t 23,906 t Belgium
2010s 21,335 t 9,072 t 12,263 t Belgium
2020s 19,836 t 8,984 t 10,852 t Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Belgium or Tunisia?
Belgium, at 17,058 t against 15,892 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Belgium and Tunisia?
1,166 t, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Tunisia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Tunisia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
Belgium ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 46th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).