Botswana vs North Macedonia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Botswana
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1,375 t against 1,141 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 234 t.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Botswana ranks 90th and North Macedonia ranks 91st of 201 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 421.93 t | 4,762 t | 4,340 t | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 556.16 t | 4,010 t | 3,454 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 607.52 t | 2,518 t | 1,911 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 662.07 t | 1,291 t | 628.85 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Botswana or North Macedonia?
- Botswana, at 1,375 t against 1,141 t in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 234 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and North Macedonia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Botswana ranks 90th and North Macedonia ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).