Cabo Verde vs Malta: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cabo Verde
- Malta
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 249.25 t against 234.82 t in Malta, a difference of 14.43 t.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 107th and Malta ranks 109th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -30.63 t | 163.21 t | 193.85 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 62.08 t | 265.34 t | 203.25 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 173.85 t | 442.35 t | 268.5 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 566.58 t | 497.35 t | 69.23 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 425.21 t | 456.52 t | 31.31 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 261.13 t | 279.22 t | 18.09 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 243.69 t | 332.88 t | 89.19 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Cabo Verde or Malta?
- Cabo Verde, at 249.25 t against 234.82 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Cabo Verde and Malta?
- 14.43 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Malta rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Cabo Verde ranks 107th and Malta ranks 109th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).