Caribbean vs Côte d'Ivoire: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Caribbean
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports -4,775 t against -22,395 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 17,620 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Caribbean has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 22nd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 24th of 29 countries.
Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31,401 t | -4,035 t | 35,436 t | Caribbean |
| 1970s | 30,564 t | -5,398 t | 35,963 t | Caribbean |
| 1980s | 31,401 t | -9,857 t | 41,258 t | Caribbean |
| 1990s | 23,439 t | -12,156 t | 35,595 t | Caribbean |
| 2000s | 14,181 t | -16,992 t | 31,173 t | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 20,261 t | -20,561 t | 40,823 t | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 969.25 t | -26,032 t | 27,001 t | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Caribbean or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Caribbean, at -4,775 t against -22,395 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Caribbean and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 17,620 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Caribbean ranks 22nd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 24th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).