Caribbean vs Ethiopia PDR: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Caribbean
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 43,564 t against -4,775 t in Caribbean, a difference of 48,339 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 9.1 times Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Caribbean ahead.
Caribbean ranks 22nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 24th of 29 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia PDR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 31,401 t | -10,960 t | 42,361 t | Caribbean |
| 1970s | 30,564 t | -667.57 t | 31,232 t | Caribbean |
| 1980s | 31,401 t | 12,052 t | 19,349 t | Caribbean |
| 1990s | 23,529 t | 26,651 t | 3,122 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Caribbean or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 43,564 t against -4,775 t in Caribbean as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Caribbean and Ethiopia PDR?
- 48,339 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Caribbean and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Caribbean ranks 22nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 24th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).