Central America vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central America
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Central America currently reports 156,904 t against 138,874 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 18,030 t.
That makes Central America's figure about 1.1 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Central America ranks 12th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 10th of 32 groups.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12,282 t | 167,616 t | 155,334 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 71,833 t | 217,622 t | 145,788 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 132,121 t | 274,219 t | 142,098 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 126,921 t | 176,722 t | 49,801 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus, Central America or Yugoslav SFR?
- Central America, at 156,904 t against 138,874 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus between Central America and Yugoslav SFR?
- 18,030 t, with Central America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Central America and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus?
- Central America ranks 12th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 10th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).