Central Asia vs Czechoslovakia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central Asia
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 87,122 t against 72,270 t in Central Asia, a difference of 14,852 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.2 times Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 16th and Czechoslovakia ranks 16th of 32 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Czechoslovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 145,882 t | 269,649 t | 123,767 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 324,652 t | 435,328 t | 110,676 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 603,955 t | 513,546 t | 90,409 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 391,847 t | 181,686 t | 210,161 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Central Asia or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 87,122 t against 72,270 t in Central Asia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Central Asia and Czechoslovakia?
- 14,852 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Central Asia and Czechoslovakia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Central Asia ranks 16th and Czechoslovakia ranks 16th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).