Central Asia vs Japan: Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central Asia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 96,623 t against 72,270 t in Central Asia, a difference of 24,353 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Central Asia ranks 16th and Japan ranks 15th of 32 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 145,882 t | 195,209 t | 49,328 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 324,652 t | 285,344 t | 39,308 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 603,955 t | 304,351 t | 299,604 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 162,929 t | 273,405 t | 110,476 t | Japan |
| 2000s | -2,249 t | 192,968 t | 195,217 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 31,067 t | 146,840 t | 115,773 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 46,282 t | 116,812 t | 70,529 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus, Central Asia or Japan?
- Japan, at 96,623 t against 72,270 t in Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus between Central Asia and Japan?
- 24,353 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Japan rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus?
- Central Asia ranks 16th and Japan ranks 15th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).