Central Asia vs Türkiye: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central Asia
- Türkiye
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 72,270 t against 70,497 t in Türkiye, a difference of 1,773 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 16th and Türkiye ranks 19th of 32 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 4 and Türkiye in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 145,882 t | -29,208 t | 175,089 t | Central Asia |
| 1970s | 324,652 t | 67,475 t | 257,177 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 603,955 t | 102,329 t | 501,626 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 162,929 t | 108,754 t | 54,175 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | -2,249 t | 55,966 t | 58,215 t | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 31,067 t | 66,162 t | 35,096 t | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 46,282 t | 71,907 t | 25,624 t | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Central Asia or Türkiye?
- Central Asia, at 72,270 t against 70,497 t in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Central Asia and Türkiye?
- 1,773 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Türkiye rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Central Asia ranks 16th and Türkiye ranks 19th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).