Chad vs Eritrea: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Chad
- Eritrea
How they compare
Chad currently reports -251.34 t against -341.73 t in Eritrea, a difference of 90.39 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Chad ranks 135th and Eritrea ranks 136th of 186 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3,836 t | 92.83 t | 3,929 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | -4,400 t | 346.71 t | 4,747 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | -6,735 t | -277.3 t | 6,458 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | -2,554 t | -341.26 t | 2,212 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Chad or Eritrea?
- Chad, at -251.34 t against -341.73 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Chad and Eritrea?
- 90.39 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Eritrea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Chad ranks 135th and Eritrea ranks 136th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).