China, Hong Kong SAR vs Estonia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 658.38 t against 397.3 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 261.08 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.7 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 97th and Estonia ranks 94th of 186 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 466.28 t | 6,770 t | 6,304 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 438.56 t | 3,124 t | 2,686 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 430.01 t | 2,249 t | 1,818 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 400.1 t | 1,104 t | 704.34 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, China, Hong Kong SAR or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 658.38 t against 397.3 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between China, Hong Kong SAR and Estonia?
- 261.08 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Estonia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 97th and Estonia ranks 94th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).