Cook Islands vs Samoa: Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cook Islands
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 58.42 t against 51.03 t in Cook Islands, a difference of 7.39 t.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Cook Islands's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cook Islands ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 123rd and Samoa ranks 121st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -7.16 t | -348.46 t | 341.3 t | Cook Islands |
| 1970s | 1.23 t | -412.32 t | 413.55 t | Cook Islands |
| 1980s | 15.28 t | -174.06 t | 189.35 t | Cook Islands |
| 1990s | 53.82 t | 98.2 t | 44.38 t | Samoa |
| 2000s | 72.06 t | 95.1 t | 23.04 t | Samoa |
| 2010s | 76.16 t | 97.59 t | 21.44 t | Samoa |
| 2020s | 55.31 t | 62.43 t | 7.12 t | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus, Cook Islands or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 58.42 t against 51.03 t in Cook Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus between Cook Islands and Samoa?
- 7.39 t, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Samoa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Samoa rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus?
- Cook Islands ranks 123rd and Samoa ranks 121st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).