Croatia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Croatia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 2,307 t against 2,115 t in Croatia, a difference of 192 t.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 79th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,177 t | 643.55 t | 12,533 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 13,656 t | 1,349 t | 12,307 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 5,124 t | 1,883 t | 3,241 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 1,861 t | 2,240 t | 378.74 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Croatia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 2,307 t against 2,115 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Croatia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 192 t, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Croatia ranks 79th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).