Czechia vs Lithuania: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus

Czechia
-9,878 t
in 2023
Lithuania
-7,819 t
in 2023
Czechia rank
173rd
Lithuania rank
171st

Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Czechia
  • Lithuania
-10.0k010.0k20.0k30.0k199220072023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports -7,819 t against -9,878 t in Czechia, a difference of 2,059 t.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 173rd and Lithuania ranks 171st of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 19,443 t 8,703 t 10,740 t Czechia
2000s 7,425 t 7,145 t 279.68 t Czechia
2010s -1,770 t 966.47 t 2,737 t Lithuania
2020s -8,864 t -7,387 t 1,478 t Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Czechia or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at -7,819 t against -9,878 t in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Czechia and Lithuania?
2,059 t, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lithuania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Lithuania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
Czechia ranks 173rd and Lithuania ranks 171st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).