Czechoslovakia vs Indonesia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Indonesia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 87,122 t against 57,597 t in Indonesia, a difference of 29,525 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.5 times Indonesia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 15th and Indonesia ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 269,649 t | -32,545 t | 302,194 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 435,328 t | -42,645 t | 477,973 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 513,546 t | 51,933 t | 461,613 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 181,686 t | 70,630 t | 111,057 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Czechoslovakia or Indonesia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 87,122 t against 57,597 t in Indonesia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Czechoslovakia and Indonesia?
- 29,525 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Indonesia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Indonesia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 15th and Indonesia ranks 18th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).