Czechoslovakia vs Türkiye: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Türkiye
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 87,122 t against 70,497 t in Türkiye, a difference of 16,625 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.2 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 16th and Türkiye ranks 19th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 269,649 t | -29,208 t | 298,856 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 435,328 t | 67,475 t | 367,853 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 513,546 t | 102,329 t | 411,217 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 181,686 t | 116,522 t | 65,165 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Czechoslovakia or Türkiye?
- Czechoslovakia, at 87,122 t against 70,497 t in Türkiye as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Czechoslovakia and Türkiye?
- 16,625 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Türkiye?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Türkiye rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 16th and Türkiye ranks 19th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).