Djibouti vs Suriname: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Djibouti
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 36.4 t against 26.65 t in Djibouti, a difference of 9.75 t.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.4 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 122nd and Suriname ranks 120th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 4 and Suriname in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 78.71 t | -73.26 t | 151.96 t | Djibouti |
| 1970s | 92.04 t | -102.05 t | 194.1 t | Djibouti |
| 1980s | 60.18 t | -102.65 t | 162.83 t | Djibouti |
| 1990s | 71.02 t | -170.99 t | 242.01 t | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 80.68 t | 209.22 t | 128.53 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 64.96 t | 70.95 t | 5.99 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 24.65 t | 54.03 t | 29.38 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Djibouti or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 36.4 t against 26.65 t in Djibouti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Djibouti and Suriname?
- 9.75 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Suriname rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Djibouti ranks 122nd and Suriname ranks 120th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).