Eastern Africa vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eastern Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 71,721 t against 44,735 t in Eastern Africa, a difference of 26,986 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.6 times Eastern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Eastern Africa ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 29 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,360 t | 42,875 t | 39,515 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | -38,028 t | 25,702 t | 63,730 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | -31,913 t | 50,337 t | 82,249 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 35,111 t | 58,338 t | 23,227 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Eastern Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 71,721 t against 44,735 t in Eastern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Eastern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 26,986 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Eastern Africa ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).