Ecuador vs Tunisia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ecuador
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 15,892 t against 13,378 t in Ecuador, a difference of 2,514 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 46th of 201 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,344 t | 1,540 t | 2,804 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 11,910 t | 1,701 t | 10,209 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 14,661 t | 11,358 t | 3,302 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 15,989 t | 5,069 t | 10,920 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 18,963 t | 6,399 t | 12,564 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 20,495 t | 9,072 t | 11,423 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 17,449 t | 8,984 t | 8,465 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Ecuador or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 15,892 t against 13,378 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Ecuador and Tunisia?
- 2,514 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Tunisia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Ecuador ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 46th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).