Estonia vs Fiji: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Estonia
- Fiji
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 658.38 t against 482.91 t in Fiji, a difference of 175.47 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.4 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 99th and Fiji ranks 101st of 201 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,770 t | 641.1 t | 6,129 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 3,124 t | -129.02 t | 3,253 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 2,249 t | 655.11 t | 1,593 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 1,104 t | 917.83 t | 186.61 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Estonia or Fiji?
- Estonia, at 658.38 t against 482.91 t in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Estonia and Fiji?
- 175.47 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Fiji?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Fiji rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Estonia ranks 99th and Fiji ranks 101st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).