Estonia vs Israel: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Estonia
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 779.21 t against 658.38 t in Estonia, a difference of 120.83 t.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 99th and Israel ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Israel in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,770 t | 6,935 t | 164.83 t | Israel |
| 2000s | 3,124 t | 4,577 t | 1,453 t | Israel |
| 2010s | 2,249 t | 1,686 t | 562.25 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 1,104 t | 895.27 t | 209.17 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Estonia or Israel?
- Israel, at 779.21 t against 658.38 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Estonia and Israel?
- 120.83 t, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Israel?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Israel rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Estonia ranks 99th and Israel ranks 97th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).