Eswatini vs Samoa: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Eswatini
- Samoa
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 64.42 t against 58.42 t in Samoa, a difference of 6 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 112th and Samoa ranks 114th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 141.96 t | -348.46 t | 490.42 t | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 399.09 t | -412.32 t | 811.4 t | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 259.09 t | -174.06 t | 433.15 t | Eswatini |
| 1990s | -528.21 t | 98.2 t | 626.4 t | Samoa |
| 2000s | -436.29 t | 95.1 t | 531.39 t | Samoa |
| 2010s | -310.62 t | 97.59 t | 408.22 t | Samoa |
| 2020s | 45.05 t | 62.43 t | 17.38 t | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Eswatini or Samoa?
- Eswatini, at 64.42 t against 58.42 t in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Eswatini and Samoa?
- 6 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Samoa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Samoa rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Eswatini ranks 112th and Samoa ranks 114th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).