Ethiopia PDR vs Italy: Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Italy
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 43,564 t against 37,658 t in Italy, a difference of 5,906 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 26th and Italy ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -10,960 t | 170,809 t | 181,769 t | Italy |
| 1970s | -667.57 t | 231,888 t | 232,556 t | Italy |
| 1980s | 12,052 t | 273,992 t | 261,940 t | Italy |
| 1990s | 26,651 t | 237,948 t | 211,297 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia PDR or Italy?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 43,564 t against 37,658 t in Italy as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia PDR and Italy?
- 5,906 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Italy?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Italy rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 26th and Italy ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).