Ethiopia vs Guatemala: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 11,852 t against 10,209 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 1,643 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Guatemala ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 55th and Guatemala ranks 54th of 201 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,788 t | 13,910 t | 3,122 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | -3,664 t | 19,977 t | 23,641 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | -14,020 t | 17,282 t | 31,303 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 7,509 t | 16,072 t | 8,562 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 11,852 t against 10,209 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia and Guatemala?
- 1,643 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Guatemala?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Guatemala rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia ranks 55th and Guatemala ranks 54th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).