Fiji vs Jordan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Fiji
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 556.52 t against 482.91 t in Fiji, a difference of 73.61 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 101st and Jordan ranks 100th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -929.83 t | -1,079 t | 149.02 t | Fiji |
| 1970s | -306.86 t | 681.36 t | 988.22 t | Jordan |
| 1980s | 916.2 t | 1,694 t | 778.11 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 530.06 t | 2,287 t | 1,757 t | Jordan |
| 2000s | -129.02 t | 1,230 t | 1,359 t | Jordan |
| 2010s | 655.11 t | 216.72 t | 438.39 t | Fiji |
| 2020s | 917.83 t | 114.06 t | 803.78 t | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Fiji or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 556.52 t against 482.91 t in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Fiji and Jordan?
- 73.61 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Jordan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Jordan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Fiji ranks 101st and Jordan ranks 100th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).