France vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- France
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
France currently reports -24,127 t against -26,727 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2,600 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
France ranks 189th and Kazakhstan ranks 191st of 201 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 316,441 t | 30,238 t | 286,203 t | France |
| 2000s | 139,934 t | -25,145 t | 165,079 t | France |
| 2010s | 42,548 t | -30,829 t | 73,377 t | France |
| 2020s | 17,216 t | -33,196 t | 50,412 t | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, France or Kazakhstan?
- France, at -24,127 t against -26,727 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between France and Kazakhstan?
- 2,600 t, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do France and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- France ranks 189th and Kazakhstan ranks 191st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).