Georgia vs United Arab Emirates: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Georgia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 1,969 t against 1,812 t in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 157 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 86th and United Arab Emirates ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,897 t | 1,334 t | 563.34 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 326.84 t | 1,579 t | 1,252 t | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 1,342 t | 1,830 t | 488.45 t | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 1,836 t | 1,812 t | 23.39 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Georgia or United Arab Emirates?
- Georgia, at 1,969 t against 1,812 t in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Georgia and United Arab Emirates?
- 157 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and United Arab Emirates?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Georgia ranks 86th and United Arab Emirates ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).