Greece vs Malawi: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Greece
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 14,446 t against 13,186 t in Greece, a difference of 1,260 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Greece's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 5 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 34,838 t | -3,395 t | 38,233 t | Greece |
| 1970s | 53,375 t | -4,194 t | 57,569 t | Greece |
| 1980s | 48,617 t | -1,263 t | 49,880 t | Greece |
| 1990s | 26,848 t | -1,521 t | 28,368 t | Greece |
| 2000s | 716.81 t | -4,002 t | 4,719 t | Greece |
| 2010s | -11,709 t | -3,416 t | 8,293 t | Malawi |
| 2020s | 187.12 t | 10,724 t | 10,537 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Greece or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 14,446 t against 13,186 t in Greece as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Greece and Malawi?
- 1,260 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Greece and Malawi rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Greece ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 48th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).