Grenada vs Suriname: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Grenada
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 36.4 t against 20.08 t in Grenada, a difference of 16.32 t.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.8 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 131st and Suriname ranks 128th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 4 and Suriname in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -5.35 t | -73.26 t | 67.91 t | Grenada |
| 1970s | 8.17 t | -102.05 t | 110.22 t | Grenada |
| 1980s | 3.96 t | -102.65 t | 106.61 t | Grenada |
| 1990s | 16.63 t | -170.99 t | 187.62 t | Grenada |
| 2000s | 15.35 t | 209.22 t | 193.87 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 23.99 t | 70.95 t | 46.96 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 20.89 t | 54.03 t | 33.15 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Grenada or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 36.4 t against 20.08 t in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Grenada and Suriname?
- 16.32 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Suriname rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Grenada ranks 131st and Suriname ranks 128th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).