Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Guatemala
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 11,952 t against 11,852 t in Guatemala, a difference of 100 t.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Guatemala ranks 54th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,119 t | 4,258 t | 2,139 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 3,584 t | 9,416 t | 5,832 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 5,235 t | 8,133 t | 2,898 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 12,261 t | 9,321 t | 2,940 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 19,977 t | 3,326 t | 16,650 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 17,282 t | 9,699 t | 7,583 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 16,072 t | 13,401 t | 2,671 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Guatemala or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 11,952 t against 11,852 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
- 100 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Guatemala ranks 54th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).