Honduras vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus

Honduras
15,328 t
in 2023
Serbia
16,935 t
in 2023
Honduras rank
47th
Serbia rank
44th

Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Honduras
  • Serbia
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 16,935 t against 15,328 t in Honduras, a difference of 1,607 t.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Honduras ahead.

Honduras ranks 47th and Serbia ranks 44th of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 7,883 t 12,680 t 4,797 t Serbia
2010s 12,908 t 11,348 t 1,560 t Honduras
2020s 14,676 t 14,085 t 591.02 t Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Honduras or Serbia?
Serbia, at 16,935 t against 15,328 t in Honduras as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Honduras and Serbia?
1,607 t, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
Honduras ranks 47th and Serbia ranks 44th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).