Israel vs Puerto Rico: Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Israel
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 922.11 t against 779.21 t in Israel, a difference of 142.9 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 92nd and Puerto Rico ranks 90th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 6 and Puerto Rico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,358 t | -555.18 t | 3,913 t | Israel |
| 1970s | 5,195 t | 1,380 t | 3,815 t | Israel |
| 1980s | 4,800 t | 1,685 t | 3,115 t | Israel |
| 1990s | 6,785 t | 1,804 t | 4,982 t | Israel |
| 2000s | 4,577 t | 1,318 t | 3,260 t | Israel |
| 2010s | 1,686 t | 1,580 t | 106.52 t | Israel |
| 2020s | 895.27 t | 1,021 t | 125.81 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus, Israel or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 922.11 t against 779.21 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus between Israel and Puerto Rico?
- 142.9 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Puerto Rico rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland phosphorus?
- Israel ranks 92nd and Puerto Rico ranks 90th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).