Kuwait vs South Sudan: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kuwait
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 2,433 t against 2,142 t in Kuwait, a difference of 291 t.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Kuwait's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Kuwait ranks 83rd and South Sudan ranks 81st of 201 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,408 t | 2,519 t | 1,112 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 1,913 t | 2,787 t | 873.31 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Kuwait or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 2,433 t against 2,142 t in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Kuwait and South Sudan?
- 291 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and South Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Kuwait ranks 83rd and South Sudan ranks 81st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).