Liberia vs Singapore: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Liberia
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 223.05 t against 141.42 t in Liberia, a difference of 81.63 t.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.6 times Liberia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.
Liberia ranks 113th and Singapore ranks 110th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -324.55 t | 1,503 t | 1,828 t | Singapore |
| 1970s | -398.46 t | 1,958 t | 2,357 t | Singapore |
| 1980s | -575.56 t | 1,172 t | 1,748 t | Singapore |
| 1990s | -206.94 t | 369.97 t | 576.91 t | Singapore |
| 2000s | -282.17 t | 249 t | 531.18 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 219.95 t | 235.32 t | 15.37 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 238.31 t | 226.2 t | 12.12 t | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Liberia or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 223.05 t against 141.42 t in Liberia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Liberia and Singapore?
- 81.63 t, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Singapore?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Singapore rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Liberia ranks 113th and Singapore ranks 110th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).