Madagascar vs Slovakia: Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus
Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Madagascar
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports -6,926 t against -7,296 t in Madagascar, a difference of 370 t.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 170th and Slovakia ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1,410 t | 7,196 t | 8,606 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | -6,595 t | 3,691 t | 10,286 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | -6,572 t | -1,385 t | 5,188 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | -6,312 t | -4,420 t | 1,892 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus, Madagascar or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at -6,926 t against -7,296 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus between Madagascar and Slovakia?
- 370 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Slovakia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland phosphorus?
- Madagascar ranks 170th and Slovakia ranks 169th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).